Turns code and work into
posts worth sharing
Monitors your tools. Aggregates context. Suggests drafts when there's substance. You edit and publish on your schedule.
2-4 suggestions per month • Not daily spam
Multi-tool monitoring detects patterns
Connects to GitHub, Slack, Gmail, Calendar. Read-only access, you choose which repos and channels.
Runs in background looking for story patterns: completed projects, solved problems, shipped features. When it finds one, asks questions to shape the draft. What was the key insight? What would help readers?
Then aggregates your answers with work context and drafts a post. You review, edit, publish, or ignore it.
Human in the loop, always
When Vulk detects story potential, it asks questions. What was the key insight? What would help readers most?
Your input shapes the draft. This makes it meaningful, not just auto-generated.
Review drafts on your schedule. Edit freely. Publish anywhere or don't publish at all. No auto-posting, no mandatory schedule, no platform lock-in.
Pattern detected
Vulk finds story potential
Asks questions
Key insight? What helps readers?
Drafts from your input
Your answers + work context
You edit and publish
Your call, always
Real work, not generic fluff
Vulk drafts from your actual work: specific problems you solved, architectural decisions you made, features you shipped.
Most users get 2-4 suggestions per month. Quality bar is high. It waits for real substance, not content on a schedule.
Gets better at sounding like you
Learns your writing style, technical focus areas, preferred terminology, and tone over time. First drafts are good. Later drafts sound increasingly like you wrote them.
Builds context about what you care about, how you explain things, what level of detail you prefer. Output becomes more authentic with every post you edit and publish.
FAQ
What makes this different from AI slop?
Most AI content has no substance. Generic "best practices" posts that could be about anyone's work. Vulk drafts from your actual work across tools. Real commits, real discussions, real problems you solved. The output has substance because the input is your specific work with full context.
Will it sound like me?
It learns your style over time. Analyzes your writing patterns, technical focus, preferred terminology, and tone from edits you make. First drafts are good. By post 10, drafts sound increasingly like you wrote them. Output gets more authentic with each post.
What tools can it connect to?
GitHub, Slack, Gmail, Google Calendar. You choose which to connect and which repos/channels to monitor. All read-only access.
How much control do I have?
Complete. When Vulk detects story potential, it asks questions. What was the key insight? What would help readers? Your input shapes the draft. Then you review, edit as much as you want, and decide whether to publish. No auto-posting.
Will I get flooded with suggestions?
No. Quality bar is high. Most users get 2-4 per month. Waits for real story potential: completed projects, solved problems, shipped features with context worth sharing.
What access does it need?
Read-only to tools you connect. You control which repos and channels it monitors. Never writes to repos, posts to Slack, or sends emails. Can't modify your code or data.
Where can I publish?
Anywhere. Export as Markdown or HTML. Your blog, dev.to, Medium, Hashnode, wherever. Or keep it private. Your content, your choice.
How is this different from ChatGPT?
ChatGPT doesn't know what you built or how you write. Vulk monitors your actual work across tools, learns your style over time, and asks questions to shape meaningful drafts. Workflow-integrated with context accumulation, not prompt-based.